Quote: chriss4242
Quote: X
Only Steve's opinion. though a seemingly solidly based opinion, it still leaves a large chunk of the web unavailable. Would also be good to see a response to Steve's opinion to balance it out from Adobe.
The market will sort itself out. I believe IOS has just taken 3rd place in browser usage (at about 1%), but dominates the mobile market. I have seen several articles similar to: http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/10/09/02/2159237/Flash-On-Android-Is-Shockingly-Bad
Something along the lines of perhaps Steve was right because it is available on Android, but doesn't work well. The mobile market is exploding one way or the other and will need to be catered for by mainstream web sites.
Which means either: 1) Adobe figures out a way to make it work properly on mobile devices -> Apple will then presumably support it like they do on the macs. or 2) It goes away and gets replaced by html 5.
In the meantime, we all wear the inconvenience. Not the 1st or last time that will happen.
Secondly, according to Steve, if they allowed flash on their mobile devices, the battery life would suffer due to the load on the processor. Flash will NEVER be available on an apple mobile device (According to SJ). THe alternatives like HTML5 will run on the mobile devices and is a vialble alternative (according to SJ).
There certainly been some fireworks around this and I read a 500 word response from SJ on it and there were no punches pulled. Apple used to own part of adobe and they have a close relationship otherwise (PDF printer is packed woth MAC OS). I watched the presentation of the iPhone 4 release and SJ reported that 58% of mobile browsing in the US is done on an iPhone. Thats a large market share and will drive corporate web page design away from flash or maybe like out Co does and display different pages depending on the device accessing the pages. For those who don't know, web sites can determine if an iPhone or computer is accessing web pages.